What is better than Google Chrome or Apple Safari? Choose a browser for iOS devices: Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox What is better google or safari
"Yandex" did own browser Fully cross-platform by releasing special versions for Android tablets and smartphones iPhone. (Earlier B. App Store. It was possible to find an exclusively version for the iPad). Vesti.Haytek tried to use domestic development instead of Safari on the iPhone.
Yandex.Browser for iPhone is replaced by updating the previously existing IOS application "Yandex.Poysk". A new version Supports the synchronization of bookmarks and the list of frequently visited sites between different devices.
The important advantage of the new browser is the presence of a "turbo" regime, which significantly accelerates the loading of pages in the conditions of slow internet connection? There is no such thing in the staff Safari. The "smart string" of the search distinguishes the addresses of sites and requests in the search engine, gives tips. Also on specific questions, the browser is able to respond immediately - for example, to issue photos or cards.
Nice pleased with the design of the novelty. Panel quick access It is large tiles with frequently visited sites. They can be deleted, change or drag - it saves time. Subjectively "Yandex.Browser" looks much more beautiful than staffing Safari. At first, it seemed unusual that the search / address line was located at the bottom of the screen, and not on top, but soon it became clear that it was much more convenient to reach it with a finger.
The speed of the browser turned out to be excellent. On the iPhone 4S author, the Safari article often begins to slow down if there are many pages. With a browser from Yandex, such problems did not arise, he constantly worked smarter.
By default in the browser, Yandex is used as a regular search engine. However, it is surprising, the company allows you to change the search engine in the settings on Google, Mail.ru and even on Wikipedia.
All these advantages of the new browser are largely crossed by the fact that IOS cannot be configured as the main browser not Safari. Thus, links from various applications All the same by default will be opened in the pre-installed browser. In Chrome for iOS, this problem is partially solved by the fact that in other applications from Google, you can configure the ability to open the default links in Chrome, it is especially true for Gmail. But the same "Yandex.Pue" is still able to open links only in Safari, with Yandex.Browser, it has not yet made friends.
Recall that the Yandex.Bauser version for desktop computers came out about a year ago. This summer, the company has released versions for Android smartphones and for iPad tablets, And last week, Yandex.Browser came out for Android tablets.
In the past few days, many spoken of web browsers. They wrote that Google is ready to pay Mozilla billion dollars over the next three years for ensuring their search engine the status of a system that is used by the "default". The reason is that now Google competes with Firefox with its chrome. And what about Safari.What are the prospects and ways to further develop this popular browser? This is a popular blogger MG Siegler.
Remember Safari?
It should be noted that Chrome managed to rise from 0% of the market in August 2008 to the whole 25% in November 2011. Apple web browser is used by 5% to 8% of the owners various devices. Safari growth slowed down at the end of 2008 - early 2009, but did not stop. Its popularity continues to grow - of course, not at the pace, like a browser Google.
Taking into account the fact that both browser work on the basis of WebKit - the engine "born" in Apple, the question arises: why Safari did not take off instead of chrome, and is not one of the most popular browsers?
The answer in general may be simple - because most still uses Windows. Microsoft is still dominant, despite the fact that Mac sales beat the records from the quarter to the quarter. But despite the fact that browser Safari. Usually associated with Mac (as built in OS X), they can use the owners of devices under windows control, and the time is much longer than Chrome.
Safari for Windows appeared in the beta version in June 2007. Then there was a wide release in March 2008. The presentation of Chrome took place in September of the same year, and initially only in the version for Windows. And google enough only one year to bypass Safari and pick up a substantial market share.
If it's not in Windows, then what? What made Chrome grow?
Another reason called most often is the speed. Numerous tests show that chrome has become the most fast browser both in the speed of displaying pages and in the performance of JavaScript.
It is worth remembering that when the Safari exit for Windows was announced, demonstrated the results of similar tests, which showed the speed superiority of Safari on Mac and on PC (do not forget that then Chrome has not existed yet). If the whole thing was at speed, why then Safari did not start in June 2007 like Chrome in September 2008?
On the other hand, many users have complained about the past few years that Safari for Windows is disappointment. If you do not take into account the test results, but the opinions of ordinary users, then it is put between Firefox and Internet Explorer. In terms of practical performance (that is, the sensation of speed during use). But Apple continues to make Safari available for both platforms, version 5.1 is no exception.
Some consider the cause of the growth of Chrome the growth of Google itself as a manufacturer. The fact is that Google is not particularly engaged in promoting your browser, except that Google.com has a link to download it. And it is difficult to see its advantage compared to IE or Safari, which are embedded in Windows and OS X, respectively. To get at your disposal Chrome, the user needs to specifically download it, and, as practice shows, for most it is not a difficulty or reason to use another browser. You can also confidently assume that most use IE or Safari simply because they received these default browsers when buying their computers.
Plus, Safari was that ITunes users received it by default, and for some time it provided him as an advantage compared to browsers for Windows. But it seems that most of the downloaded it simply did not use it.
Maybe, advantages of Chrome Are extensions? Perhaps, but in Safari, they also have from mid-2010. Of course, in Chrome, they are more convenient to use them, but for sure - if it were only in them, the developers would have joined the game and would give them more attention. Besides, in Firefox Extensions They appeared long before Chrome and Safari, but they did not help the browser break into the leaders, it is still inferior in the popularity of Chrome.
With the start of OS X Lion it seemed that the Renaissance could begin for Safari. The default settings have changed, a third-party type of Chrome received limitations. Safari also appeared new features - improved support for multitouch and reading list (for synchronization between iOS and OS X Lion), which did not have competitors. But the data of several months have shown that Safari's growth remained slow, existing due to the quantitative growth of Mac sales.
Given the growth in the mobile industry, it would be possible to assume that the increase in users of the mobile version of Safari will help increase the number of Safari users on laptops and desktop systems. But the numbers still show a very slow growth of the "apple" browser. Meanwhile, Chrome, which is not part of Android (perhaps, but, nevertheless, it is definitely not) is rapidly gaining momentum without the help of the mobile industry.
According to MG Siegler, he himself enjoys Chrome. Several times he tried to go to Safari as the main browser (for the last time - with the release of OS X Lion update), but eventually returned to Chrome. Exclusively due to performance and practical convenience. For example, in working with 10 or more open tabs, Safari is inferior to Chrome, and not only in this.
MG Siegler also says that it cannot live without OmniBox, the address bar at the top of each open tabwhich chrome offers. He often uses the possibility of folding tabs and place them on the left side of the screen, separately from the total number of open websites.
Already passed almost 9 years since Safari officially spoke to Steve Jobs at the MacWorld event in 2003. The browser since then is constantly being improved and saves its share of users, but compared to Chrome grows much slower (during this time Safari managed to get half with more than less users than Chrome).
Of course, the situation can still quickly change if iPad type devices will replace most custom computers. If we talk only about mobile devices, then no doubt in the superiority of Safari before Google does not remain, since in Google have not yet made the mobile version of your browser. And it makes an even more strange opposite situation in the field of traditional PC.
In general, the MG Siegler failed to completely understand. It is possible that the priorities of the Apple itself, which deviates the development of the App Store, offering to use native products, and not look for analogs in the network. But, again, the development of mobile Safari rejects this assumption. Most likely, the point is still in the very Google Chrome.which turned out to be a truly good product. Success comes to good products.
Laboratory site site has been spending tests for several years software For Android devices, and now we have decided to expand our horizons. Now on the expanses of our resource you can meet application reviews for iOS database.
And let's start with the consideration of those programs in which the clock "stick" without which the smartphone would not be a full gadget that provides direct Internet access and a connection to the virtual world.
First of all we will look at standard application Apple Safari, with which you are comparable to the already familiar Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox.. Maybe "The iPhone browser is so good and ideal that his competitors are simply not needed?
The following device was used as test equipment:
- Apple iPhone 6 smartphone (installed iOS system 10.3.2).
Apple Safari.
Acquaintance
There are rumors that all Apple products are immediately ready to use what is called, "out of the box," they do not need to be refined, they are perfect ... it sounds optimistic, but what if? Let's start finding out this fact from the mobile version of the Safari browser.
Beginning of work
Immediately after buying and activating your Apple mobile device, you can notice an unusual icon with a compass on its screen. It would seem what is the connection here? In my opinion, the developers show that their application will help find any information on the network, as if on the compass. I hope.
The main menu of the Safari browser is represented by icons with our favorite bookmarks. Regardless of whether you have the usual iPhone or Plus version, there will always be four icons in width, but in height or five or six. For the iPhone with the "classic" diagonal of the layout of the elements is quite good, but in the "big" version of the smartphone the display size is used poorly.
There is a search panel attached to the top of the screen. Well, at least a search engine is allowed to choose, and I easily installed Yandex, the benefit basically I use it.
As for the sites themselves and their scan, then everything is ordinary. In most cases, by default loads mobile versionwhich, again, is usually well optimized for the iPhone. True, the text does not adapt to the device screen, so it is sometimes not very convenient to read.
Actually, this is all that is available to the user in the browser of one of the most advanced devices in model row Apple.
For switching between pages, an additional menu is used, in it tabs are located in a very unusual way than fascinating. Pay attention to the screenshots.
By the way, from this section you can go to " Private mode", Only here it is called" Private Access ". If someone asks the smartphone to enter the Internet, then I always open this mode, especially if I don't want to close the dozens of my tabs.
The difference between the usual regime and private occasion is almost impossible to consider. Perhaps Apple could somehow integrate here Touch ID for secure access to bookmarks, a resource or as a password for separately taken folders.
I will not talk about history and bookmarks, because there is nothing interesting. All bookmarks are stored on the device and in the cloud storage, are constantly synchronized with all our Apple gadgets. In the tab, you can create folders. I remember, there was no such possibility on the iPhone 3G.
Settings
If applications google companies There is still some parameters, then in most Apple applications there is no such partition, and the Safari browser has not exceeded.
Testing
Everything apple applications They work as smoothly as possible, clearly and stable, you will not see messages "the application closed by mistake ...", "the program stopped responding and was closed ..." and so on. This is a certain success compared to Android, just that is not different.
Whatever actions do not do in the Safari browser, no matter how much tabs are open - the smartphone will make your actions as smoothly. Even tabs practically do not reboot, especially if hands iPhone. 6S or newer, with lots of random access memory. It can be easily said that this browser works gorgeous.
About support Adobe Flash. This browser never knew and would not know.
As for online browser tests, here Safari shows itself pretty good.
conclusions
Apple Safari is a wonderful browser for the undemanding user. It works well and will not make it be bored, waiting for downloading a page, does not slow down, does not contain bugs and almost always works smoothly. In principle, in terms of stability and work, there are no complaints about it.
The choice of browser is a matter of habit, but there is a set of factors in favor of Safari, which should be taken into account, especially working in the OS X environment.
Hot spores on what browser is the best will never subscribe. Almost every user considers his duty to defend the honor of the program that every day uses. Safari., Chrome., Firefox., Opera. And many other solutions today are available to OS X users, but the choice often occurs between the listed browsers.
Opera. - Explicit Outsider. The browser popular in the post-Soviet space was rapidly lost the audience and is now supported exclusively by the enthusiasm of developers, as well as a small part of devotees. The patient is still alive, although it has long been powered through the tube.
An interesting situation is also with Firefox.. The position of the browser has long been not that before. Sunset of "Fire Lisa" strikingly coincided with a flourishing Chrome.. Browser from Google is currently the most popular alternative solution for windows usersAnd for OS X adherents. For some reason, it seems that with direct comparison of Internet Explorer is more often replaced by a third-party browser than Safari, but it is already details.
So, Competition Safari and Chrome as part of OS X It turns out quite serious. Both sides have serious arguments in support of a particular browser. Google's solution really has a lot strong Parties, as, however, and Safari. Both programs are based on the engine WebKit.The difference is different.
By and large Chrome fits perfectly into the ecosystem of Google devices, although at the same time computer MAC. And looks a bit strange in it. Of course, Safari has much larger and thoughtful integration not only within OS X, but also with mobile devices On the iOS database. No third-party solution can boast of such connections and opportunities. There is already an Apple policy.
On another scales google servicesWith which Chrome works just perfect. The presence of a mobile browser of the same name on your smartphone or tablet can also be interpreted as an argument in favor of Chrome. As you can see, a lot depends on personal preferences, habits and used services on the network. Much, but not all.
There is at least several objective flaws Chrome for OS X, to put up with whom it is not worth it.
First, the browser from Google frankly casually consumes battery energy Your MacBook. These are not empty words: There are many tests in which computer Apple. It works noticeably longer when using Safari, while Chrome does not strongly help autonomy. It is possible that you are ready to sacrifice the hour-two for the sake of the usual browser, but this is not the only drawback.
I am not a big fan of synthetic tests. I believe that visual impressions when choosing a browser is much more important. Therefore, according to my observation, within the framework of the OS X Safari, it hardly leaves the chances of competitors. Web pages will be opened quickly in both cases - everything depends on the speed of the network. The point is in the other. Using alternately Safari and Chrome it is easy to notice how much Apple's browser works smoothly. He perfectly acts in operating systemfor which it was created. Chrome is also fast, but it is already perceived differently, not so, the browser lacks the gloss of branded applications OS X. In general, synthetic tests that are not difficult to find on the Internet will also confirm the superiority of Safari in many cases, so a visual assessment in this case did not fail.
The following advantage of Safari can also be challenged, but Apple's browser is already from the box offers users more opportunities. Here you have and broadcast links from social networks, and a list of deferred reading, and an excellent Top SITES start screen, and Reader mode. But here you can add expansion. In other words, the first launched Safari is extremely friendly to the user.
This can not be said about Chrome. When I first launched this browser on Windows, it was slightly shocked. He had to replace Opera, but his emptiness and the fundamental principle of "do with the help of extensions" demanded a lot of time on addictive and search for suitable plug-ins. Bookmarks in this browser is a nightmare. The transition to Safari after a couple of years has passed much more calmer. Well, it is impossible not to note that without account Google to use Chrome is completely uncomfortable.
Here it would be possible to affect the theme of privacy and speculate where Google sends and how our data from the browser uses, but do this not. You all understand no worse than me and you probably have your own opinion about the current state of affairs. Therefore, pay attention to what smooth scrolling of pages in Safari, just perfection! Drugan scrolling in Chrome does not cause such delight.
We have already remembered about increased power consumption, so you should still mention the elevated Chrome appetite to random access memory. There is already nothing to add: that in Windows, that in OS X - everywhere browser from Google consumes a lot of valuable megabytes of RAM. Safari in this regard is much more economical, although he had a leakage of RAM, which "hung" MacBook Air.. Updates solved the problem.
Stop using Windows, I stopped using and chrome browser. Not immediately, the transition to Safari also passed gradually, but I don't want to return it at all. Living in ecosystem apple devices There is absolutely no need for Chrome with his eternal dismissive attitude to the OS X platform. Maybe Apple is not in a hurry to develop Safari at such a high pace that competitors took with their browsers, but the solution from Cupertino too organically fits into the system to look for him Alternatives, and obvious shortcomings of the same Chrome make the choice practically unconditional.
In the comments, I propose an objective dialogue, supported by arguments and real facts, and not a fan dispute. Read above perceive as a personal opinion, and not the truth in the last instance.
Recently wondered - what is better and more convenient to use - Safari browser or Google Chrome? I stated my thoughts about this in this article.
Most PC users are managed using popular on this moment Browser from Google - Chrome. Why did he become so popular? The answer is very simple - everything because of its simplicity, speed and small voraciousness of the RAM of memory. It's all of course good, but what if you search still browsers, because there will probably have competition for him. And as for me, the Chrome's competitor can be considered a Safari browser from Cuppertinov.
First, let's consider the pros and cons both browsers.
Let's start perhaps with. So, they made their browser almost perfect - it quickly opens the pages, it is very easy to use and, most importantly, eats little RAM, to all this can be synchronized with google accountthat by the way is very convenient. Of course, there are also disadvantages, for example, you cannot independently exhibit sites in Top Sites, they are set by some incomprehensible way. It seems like all the minutes and end.
And what can Safari browser oppose Chrome? Of course you will be surprised, but this is a design and a little Fich, which is not chromium. Let's start with the design, it is as always in the spirit of Apple, I don't even talk about, but you can emphasize how to look beautifully top sites and history. As in chrome, you can put plugins, for example Gmail, which is very convenient if you use this service email. Also, a small features of the Safari browser is a change of interface - you can change the interface, it is sometimes really convenient.
Also a very big advantage that the Safari browser has, is the smoothing of fonts, the text is directly pleasant to read. Yes, it is possible if you use chrome in Mac OS X, there the fonts are smoothed by the Os'a itself, then you will not notice the difference, but it is very noticeable on Windows. Minuses in Safari Honestly Multiple, firstly sometimes "falls" the WebKit, well, it was personally for me, I do not know how other users. There is no test of spelling, that is, it is, but not in Russian. Well, such a useful thing as synchronization of bookmarks and settings.
Well, in general, I would choose the Safari browser, all the same, he somehow attracts me more on Windows, but here Apple's alas do not often produce updates compared to version for OS X.
Such a conclusion: if the speed of work and browser is important for you, then I advise you Google Chrome. Well, if you prefer design in the style of Cupertinov and a bit of Fich, then this 100% must be a Safari browser.